The Kyle Phoenix Blog: metrosexuality

Monday, June 25, 2018

Kyle Phoenix Answers: Are men becoming more bisexual or gay in today's world?

Yes, but in a social and experimental way, not necessarily a long term affectional way. It's the social sphere of more progressive thoughts about sexuality that more males/females are acting on situations and impulses. Whether sexuality is biological is still out there but what is interesting in a Westernized ontology is needing a biological test for a human feeling or impulse.

Imagine that two guys fall into sex or a relationship, must we blood test them to validate it on some biological homosexual scale?

I had two friends who lived in the dorm room next to mine, a couple of years later I ran into them at a party and they explained that for the year we were neighbors they were inspired by me, my outness to essentially try homosexuality. They were both straight. They proceeded to fuck each other I every position, configuration, duration and manipulation possible. They got girlfriends. They proudly proclaimed publicly having been experimentally sexual with one another, that experiment being over and now being straight/heterosexual but their point was that my ancillary example of comfort made them challenge their discomfort and explore their sexuality safely.

Heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality are scientific terms for species activity, it has very little to do with people and their feelings. When Westernized ontology tries to classify and label human feelings and actions it fails because we're mercurial.

That mercuriality is yes, making males and female, I say that so we can clearly include children experimenting maintaining flexibility. The sexuality fluidity that more women example is the same in men but social rules and ontologies often have men spouting scientific babble that doesn't account for humans being human and trying stuff out.
Related image

Those two guys from college?
Gay, straight or bi?
Does it matter?
Or what about something truly revolutionary, you ASK someone or simply accept whatever that person says they are based upon invisible, non codifiable feelings that they have.

Then you shut up.

If it changes the next day, the only responsibility that someone has is to alert us.

The guys explained that they tried something one day and no longer did so.

And you know what I did?

I accepted them as human beings and have never rushed to whip out my label maker to label them, even in memory....or for science. That biological codification is dangerous, not even from just an abortion perspective but say you're an adult and you don't fit the bio specs, are you then mentally ill? Are you at liability for perpetrating a sexuality fraud? Could I sue/divorce you if I thought I was marrying a bio same sexer and you're not?

Better to let people answer for themselves than rely too heavy on biological markers.

Perhaps in an African and Native context, which is more mature, humans are trusted to express their spirits.

B00CUG9DDW