Friday, February 17, 2023

How do upper middle-class black people view hood black people? by Kyle Phoenix

Odd. Loud. You have no Idea how LOUD people are and when you realize they’re LOUD you realize it’s because they come from a different space/social class.

I live in Washington Heights, Manhattan—-which on one hand seems like it would be toney—-and it is—-million dollar townhouses and condos, Columbia Presbyterian Hospital sprawling over multiple blocks. But it’s also an extension of Harlem—-so there is a heavy minority presence that is Black and Latino—-other than language and some cultural ticks—the same to me.

Growing up, I lived in all of the other boroughs—-Brooklyn, Staten Island, the Bronx, even Yonkers, living in Queens, Flushing, when I got back from undergraduate university. Then after a few years in Queens I made my way to Manhattan and have lived within the same 40–50 blocks for about 15 years. What I like about it is that it’s convenient to so much in the City that is open late as I am a night owl. Yes, that’s me going food shopping at 3 AM. Also I’m in a west side subway corridor that includes home, entertainment, Columbia University for work, and then further downtown for midtown work and entertainment and then even ease in traveling out of NJ to other states for work by train/car.

Historically most of my family has lived in the outer boroughs, I was actually conceived in Manhattan, my parents going to college here and then born in Manhattan, so I’m sort of spiritually tied to the whole shebang. I enjoyed the suburbia of Buffalo and then I lived in the mountains, when my mother bought a house, in Pennsylvania, commuting back and forth to the co-op in Brooklyn. And then she and her husband moved to Charlotte, eventually buying a house there.

I’ve been able to move through lots of places, around family and not, and because my parents were college educated, and my mother decided to have only 1 child with my father, and no more with her later husbands, there has been a level of financial control/stability and then increase in my life and childhood that is different from my cousins and their parents.

My cousins, or my aunts and uncle, had 7, 3 and 3 children respectively. My mother saw the chaos having multiple children with multiple parents brought/wrought—-which is why I’m an only child. But when I would visit cousins, she laid down social class based rules that I didn’t understand until years later when I was teaching about it and reading the research.

There were certain foods—-spam, scrapple, chitlins—-I wasn’t allowed to eat—-to politely refuse. It even went so far that when I visited, I remember bringing my own food. I remembered my uncle’s children drank powdered milk and I refused. There wasn’t the same food limitations at home—-one of my stepfathers was a chef so he brought home dozens of T-bone steaks, bags of shrimp, lobster, and could whip up anything in the kitchen. And we weren’t in the kitchen a lot—-I had to beg to be taught to cook—-because my mother and he loved making reservations, going to grand restaurants——because they could afford it. Not only did this vastly expand my palate—-there are only a few foods I don’t care for—-olives, milk, yogurt—-but it also meant that eventually even I could cook a wide range of foods. My mother would even offer to cater events and then come home and give me the money to feed 75 people with my cooking skills—-I was 16.

These things seem interesting on one level but there’s a level of social class mobility, elevation and in particular the middle class habituation of concerted cultivation: I was taught/educated to be and act as an adult at a very young age.

I also always seemed to have money—-there was envy and jealousy I know from my cousins—-because my parents assisted me in starting small businesses first locally and then nationally. I was able to develop those skills because of their entrepreneurial work and also being taken to my mother’s job at AT&T—-where I would photocopy and enlarge comic book scenes and sell them in the cafeteria at school. My mother gave me a Tax ID Number at 14 to better run my amateur comic book company. My cousins didn’t have these advancing benefits.

When I got around my cousins and would mention or try to explain, I often found them childish or ignorant or not worth talking to.

Poverty seems to me, extremely intellectually limited. The biggest thinking occurring from TV and movies. I can tell you now that I limit my company/friendships, even dating away from excessive TV watchers who don't have higher educations. TV/movies communicate warped values and mores, so often that’s what I hear and notice in people below middle class upbringing.

Also I notice lack of critical thinking and what I refer to in teaching as pinging. I notice that poor people are constantly announcing reality to one another as a form of reality-confirmation.

“Did you see the blue car?”

“Yeah, I saw the blue car!”

“Did you see the blue car drive fast?”

“Yeah, I saw the blue car go fast.”

Or asking of obvious questions. I’m sitting on the train reading a book.

“Are you reading a book?”

“You must like reading.”

“That’s a book.”

It’s a form of almost Captain Obvious level announcing of reality because poverty is deeply focused on relationships—-so communication is this constant attempt to connect. or to intrude. Middle class and higher, relationships take on different expectations, qualities, networking, infusions.

Networking and Aiding Family

Undereducated cousins my age, I don’t even bother trying to communicate with—-because their lives include mundane work, addictions, jail, poverty, irrational behaviors, tc.. I don’t consider them “less than human” but they’re living entirely different mindset lives than I am. The exclusion is also self-protective—-because I’ve earned a pretty decent living so I have helped some cousins/parents out—-worked at some popular corporate/educational places where one can assume I was making a pretty good salary. I’ve even helped cousins and friends get jobs—-like you walk into my office, I make a phone call and they got a job that day. I thought that was natural—-to send a qualified candidate—-but that’s unusual in poverty but the action, is attached to relationships and the intense relational connections assumed in poverty. But not everyone in my family is qualified/educated for those kinds of positional-hook ups.

Family Trying to Get/Steal Money from Me

I’ve been bamboozled out of money—-one cousin had me and my parents convinced she wanted to change her life, get off of welfare and move out of New York (she’d give n up her kids, severed parental rights and been on welfare for `9 years—-so my family worked on me for a year to sublet her huge Manhattan apartment—-I move in—-and suddenly she decides not to move. Which I confronted, if you needed/wanted a roommate you should’ve said so and then she had the two criminal adult children move in and then—-I moved out after 3 months.

Later my from poverty stepfather, that my mother bought with her largesse to have as a companion, as she lay dying, took me to court trying to get money out of me. I got to cross examine him in court—-jousting with his hired lawyer. He lost and had to pay the lawyer, court fees, etc.. I paid a nominal fee and left. He wanted me to replace my mother in his life—-financially—-which I refused. I would assist but there are normal levels of budgets an adult must manage for themselves. He refused to do this—the household losing half of the income when my mother went into the hospital. I gave him money for years and come to find out several of my cousins down there were giving him money to—-everyone kept in the dark as he made the rounds, never explaining he was getting from us all.

How Poverty Affects Folk

So family and even students from poverty, I have found mostly to be capable of great sympathy, help, support but also greed, fear, lies—-I would suggest that decades of poverty to adults suggests a terminality to life that is only solved by money. I would further offer that what happens with poor people is that insane amount of constant TV watching often suggests that stuff, riches, etc. is out there and they could-should have it/access. So my stepfather is making $10 an hour after taxes trying to drive and maintain and fuel a Mercedes—-about $200 worth of gas a week BEFORE the gas price hikes. But that goes to show a poverty mindset. I took the bus all around Charlotte, it literally stopping in front of their house. I think twice I took a cab/Uber. But the bus was 90 cents!

I think poverty affects people the same overall, but there are exceptions—-helpful, thoughtful, good people who happen to be poor. And those who are poor and scheme, lie, cheat, steal, sell drugs to try and rocket themselves out of poverty. None of that works long-term. Or more importantly the money flows in but they lack financial education so they don’t know how to bank, transform, multiply the money. My stepfather wanted to start a business, but my mother had all the money and acumen, so he wanted me to figure one out and manage it. That he would own. I nodded politely and kept running my media business from my laptop while I was there.

Karma

My sublet cousin, eventually lost the apartment over $18, ended up homeless in Atlanta, then in Charlotte, then back to a homeless shelter in NYC and then prison in Boston and then back to a shelter in NYC, two blocks from her former apartment.

Ironically I was headed to a meeting, on the lower east side, got off on the wrong stop so I had to walk—-a guy asked me directions and a lady pushes past us to cross the street—-I had stopped ta the block—-looking at the sublet I’d been with her years prior. A few months later I bumped into her sister who told me her sister’s tragic story and that yes, that woman who bumped past us was probably my cousin headed to the shelter.

I was in my Emporio Armani suit a Salvatore Ferragamo shoes, feeling all high paid teaching job cute.

I’d been deeply emotionally hurt after hr bamboozle attempt—-though she was so greedy to get the money from me that she mis-did the math. The maintenance cost through Welfare was $309 a month for a huge two bedroom with a dining room on the lower east side. When I went to discuss it with friends—-everyone was offering to chip in to buy furniture, etc., whatever she wanted to sell to give her a nest egg to go to Charlotte with—-my mother and stepfather ready to help her get a job (he did—-she was fired the first week)—-so I said I can go as high as a thousand—-but I meant $1000 PLUS the $309. She thought I meant $309 plus $350——so she demanded I give her $650 a month—-in total including electricity, etc. One of my friends hit me and I said yes.

Welfare & The Co-Op Game

The side to this was that Welfare creates coops to lower expenditures to Welfare recipients’ landlords. Welfare “sells” the co-op apartment back to the tenant and thereby doesn’t have to “send” the rent check anywhere and always gets paid by owning the building.

The tenant has to give two downpayments to get in—-$300 times two and then $309 a month, as maintenance. So after 19 years my cousin is watching the real estate market, seeing apartments in the neighborhood going for $2 million and that her Welfare coop sales term, transfer of ownership is up year 20. When I left, she’s back in arrears after a couple of months—-the first thing she did with the rent/security—-$1300 was run out and go shopping—-I should’ve known then….

So she’s back in Housing Court but no me, no sister, no one to borrow the spent rent-maintenance on—-yes, they give it to adults as cash to then send off—-it’s mainly if you’ve been a long time recipient they do this—-someone wised up in the past decade. So she’s in arrears $618. She doesn't have it but offers to sell out arly and they can cut the $2 million according by two years. They politely explain that she’s misunderstood them and real estate, particularly how a coop works. A coop is not ownership of the property but of “shares” like stock that are the valuation of the property.

By buying the building, Welfare then could set the value of the apartment which was the double payments to get in $600. Thereby the equity in the apartment is $600 and she’s been paying the maintenance. So to “sell” she can sell it back to them—-and they’ll credit the value $600 to her arrears. Does she have the remaining $18?

She did not. They threw her out.

That’s the machinations of poverty—-they’re always back to square one—-while being loud I notice. Or too many child, as my mother noticed about her siblings—-without consideration that each child is at a minimum of $10k to rais, house, clothe, feed—— so less children, especially if you divorce the other parents, is probably best.

I see in my family, like the aboves—all still living in poverty and in my students that we’re trying to get out of poverty—-a too close/impulsivity that often undermined getting out of poverty.

My cousin, if she had listened, and even followed the family plan—-would’ve understood her co-op situation but my mother was willing to make a sizeable offer to the co-op after my living there to Year 20—-Welfare would’ve just re-upped her—-but she could’ve been receiving an extra $1000 a month on top of the maintenance fee—-plus working in full time in Charlotte—-even at a nominal salary that would have covered her apartment ($500 in Charlotte), car, food, etc. and she’d have her paycheck to herself. But she wrecked it herself so there was no second bite at the apple (me or her sister).

My cousin is technically mentally ill with narcissism, entitlement, etc.. I won’t even go to her funeral.

My Black Stepfather

My stepfather wouldn’t listen that the house was slightly underwater from the housing recession—bought at $100k (overpriced) and he was advised by my middle class/higher cousin a retired mortgage broker—-sell the house to Kyle before his mother dies—-2 years is when the stat/Medicaid attaches to property—-so you have to get it out of the ill person’s name and their spouse—-then he rents it back to you. My stepfather was terrified of this so he was eating turkey neck soup and driving a falling apart, gas guzzling 2005 Mercedes and trying to get money out of all of us. I bring my mother back to NY, she dies and he’s stuck with a house that is worth $70k but has dropped in equity value to essentially $0—-as if they’d just bought it, all the equity eaten up.

My second offer to him had been I’ll help you put additions onto the house to the of $25k which in 7 years, real estate appreciating at 3 to 5 percent a year will get you back to the original sale price PLUS $25 of build ons, to equity. My cousin said he was too stupid to accept this.

My third alternative was that Welfare/Section 8 there rents out your house and pays directly to the owner/mortgage—-you simply list your house online and it’s then inspected. He balked at this.

So for another 7 years he sits in the house, paying the mortgage, then a buyer comes along and buys it for $116k—-$6k over the original price they bought it for. After taxes and expenses on the $6k he moves to an apartment. Essentially having paid rent on a house for 15 years, that he doesn’t own.

The couple who bought it? Nice little old White couple—-who had it appraised and the value was $156k. So they made $40k at the signing. Which speaks to generational wealth based upon race, education and how poor people stay poor by their own impulsive greed and lack of education.

So that’s kind of what I think and notice about poorer Black and Latino people unless they show a greater capacity to learn, earn and understand.

#KylePhoenix

#TheKylePhoenixShow

What was the most gay thing you did when you were a kid/young teen (7-13)? by Kyle Phoenix


I convinced my mother at 10 to buy me these, similar boots. We were at a department store, I spotted them——fell in LOVE. They were a darker reddish brown and the top cuff was a fluffier lighter sherling.

I LOVED them. But even at 10 I knew they were feminine, if not outright girls boots. But I LOVED them.

So with my prodigiousness intact I calmly found my size and went over to my mother and handed them to her as my choice.

“I think these might be girls boots.”

“Oh? They were over there in the unisex section. For girls and boys.”

My mother scrunched up her face, trying to figure this out.

“I really like them, they’re comfortable and waterproof.”

“This heel is at least 3 inches.”

“Look at the snow grip on that. Good treads.”

“Are you sure?”

“I am.”

“Promise me that you’ll wear them with your slacks or jeans over them? Don’t tuck your slacks or jeans into them.”

(OH! I hadn’t thought of that fashion move.)

“Sure, sure. No problem. Over. Always.”

She bought them….and days later I was sauntering around the 4th grade with my slacks/jeans tucked tightly into them.

And occasionally, by myself, doing a full Wonder Woman twirl to change from Diana Prince to Wonder Woman.

And then I would run——and run I did—-in my high heeled boots.

Christmas 2022—-as my year end treat—-I went on footwear binge, and bought some Durango's and Ferragamo's.

Yes, I allow my slacks to fall over them. Best Emporio Armani suit support ever. But it’s a 2 inch plus heel, has a sure grip/base and fits right in with my dozen other pairs of boots in varying colors. I no longer do the Wonder Woman transformational spin but I walk….I walk like a motherfucking STAR in my boots. My dream is to wear my Emporio Armani suits with my red bottom 3–4 inch boots or stilettos at some sort of board meeting, any board meeting—-I will crash a board meeting!

My ultimattttttttttttttttttte boot fantasy—-I might go this summer. One has to go to Paris for this.

Christian Louboutin Boots

As a man, one must go to The HOUSE of Louboutin to have them custom made for your feet/legs. $2500 a pair.

Yes, I will wear them from the hotel to the parties in Paris and then to the airport, and then take them off on the plane………… but PUT THEM BACK ON when we land in NYC!!!!!

I’ll probably find a way to involve a long coat, scarf, Armani suit and dark shades and ATTITUDE!

This is what those “unisex” boots have wrought a couple of decades later. lol

This is probably besides my insane scarf collection the most effeminate thing I calmly, casually and often do. Boots. Shut up. lol

#KylePhoenix

#TheKylePhoenixShow

Why do some New Yorkers happily take the subway but refuse to take the bus? by Kyle Phoenix

 

An odd question deserves my odd answer. I’ve lived here all my life, I have lived in every borough, even Long Island, New Jersey and Yonkers. I use Uber in other states but so far never in NY. I have occasionally hailed a cab, when I moved to Harlem and worked in Harlem, $7 cabs back and forth, part of my normal budget.

But buses? Them sonsofbitches?

I Don’t know what it is, it might be me, some inner ear bs, but I have trouble, standing, sitting and not pitching over, on buses. I feel like I’m going to stumble, fall, tumble over. The swaying, the lurching, the drama. Plus people too close—-I’m not a germaphobe but I appreciate a little space—-people way too close on buses. All the shuffling and moving and stopping and starting.

I use buses the way people use cabs or minivans——to take a long ride when you have nothing better to do, to cart items from stores when I have no desire to hire a car or take it on the subway—-I got this 5x7 beautiful wooden picture frame. Subway? Nah. I just walked half a block and got off across the street from my house.

When I go to the post office—-it’s easier to take my packages in tote bags on the bus then on the subway, it’s generally a no rush day (Have I mentioned how one aims post office days for days off from work? It’s not that the post office is slow, it’s that the post office is also an underground above ground money transfer system for the immigrant population who NEVER, having been in the country for 30+ years——remember how to do the thing they’ve done for 30+ plus years, every week. Every visit it seems is an experience, a new experience, for our immigrant population. MetroCard machines, supermarkets, ATM machines—-God save us from the multi-lingual machines that start to clearly explain the basic functions and need to be deeply read and gently massaged and two questions asked by people in front of me!!!!!!———-yes, that was a rant.)

I’ve noticed on the bus—-when I’m hauling giant wooden frames or bookcases from Target or large food/clothing purchases or even books—-that the bus is populated, and really the conveyance of the older, elderly crowd. Which slows it down.

Did I mention that I NEVER see anyone wheel chairing about but suddenly if I’m on the bus—-every other stop has to stop for a wheelchair and it’s no longer just one but two, three folk in also large scooter/mini-cars-dirt bikes?

The fun irony to this is that upon bringing her back to NYC, I had to use the bus to push my mother, in a wheelchair, to her doctor’s appointments. And I was like, okay, I get itThis is for this population. My mother not having been in NY in years——and no longer having an “inside” voice—-kept talking to me—-saying my name over and over and over and over again for the 20 block ride.

My mother said my name so much that when we got off the driver AND the passengers—yelled—-”Bye, Kyle!” laughing.

I value buses, I do.

I also tend to not need a weekly MetroCard every week because I don’t go places sometimes 5 days consecutively. I would like to defend myself with I live in Manhattan and rarely leave the borough—-walking to places, most times, so it’s only when I know I have more than a handful of trips that I buy an Unlimited card or have extra cash on my card to even consider taking the bus. They cost $33 for the week and I often eke it out to $22 a week so I’m good for using the free transfer after being on the subway——generally to come back from the post office.

I’m a walker, within say 20–30 blocks. I’m good for taking the bus sometimes to come back from a walk, then it feels quicker and the subway system while faster, is more of general to where you’re going, whereas at least half the buses are able to be more specific. I even use the Text A Time Arrival feature on the bus stops—-I notice not many people seem to.

But some buses, I have gotten off and walked. Across Harlem? Children, adults, old people, wheelchairs PACKED going crosstown. DURING a pandemic. I saw how fast it could spread with a hundred people packed onto a bus. I’m not paranoid but I am more thoughtful after COVID, so between that and my wobbly wobbly—-it feels like I’m on roller skates on the bus—-I minimize my interaction with it.

#KylePhoenix

#TheKylePhoenixShow

Tuesday, February 14, 2023

Do you live in a sixth floor walk up in New York City, and how did you get used to it? by Kyle Phoenix

I found an ad online about a real estate agent renting an apartment in Washington Heights, on 165th street. I was going to break down and move to the Bronx—-139th Street, right across the Harlem bridge—-I worked at a school/non-profit on 125th Street. I’d been on 146th Street in Harlem, a 4th floor walk up—-but it was two medium sized rooms, a bedroom and the other room was a living room/kitchen, with the bathroom/front door in-between them. The apartment in the Bronx though had exposed brick walls, a 2nd floor walk up and it was ONE train stop from Manhattan—-so I could imagine it wasn’t the Bronx.

The only issue was the landlord/owner had redone the whole place and needed to get a COI—-so there was at least a 2 month wait. Which is how I went to see the short term sublet on 165th. When I got there—-it was a 6th floor walk up, a 2 bedroom. BUT someone else had already come to see it and the real estate agent, let’s call her Janet—-Janet says that in order to get the semi-furnished apartment speedily rented, she’s offering to rent each bedroom. So if I’m willing to share the 2 bedroom with him—-I can have it for $800 a month. The rent on the apartment I was waiting for was $1200, so it was a deal. I had the majority of my stuff in storage at about $200 a month so it budgeted out.

Two months later—-the other roommate had cooked and nearly burned down the kitchen, so he’d been cast out. It was then offered to me what if I moved in/stayed for $1000 a month?

I went back to the Bronx apartment and he still hadn’t gotten his COI. My issue was the storage room—-like 90% of my stuff in storage all the time, back and forth, and potentially looking at two moves to the Bronx—and again, I have a pathological disinterest in visiting, much less living in the Bronx—-I was really changing all of my mentality for that great apartment. But time was dragging on.

Though it was a sixth floor walk up, I agreed to it just as a coworker was moving—-so I went to go help him move with my students and actually dislocated my knee—-luckily the students were able to help carry the sofa up and I discovered Fresh Direct, perfect food delivery. I took a few days off of work and hobbled up and down the stairs.

Welfare, Poor People, The Scam

It turned out it was a primarily a senior citizens building—-the real estate agent, Janet—-was lying—-she was actually a Welfare recipient illegally renting out her apartment. I regularly mailed my rent to Maryland—-her new address—-she claimed she was the property manager too. I was there for three years and I discovered it was a scam when she stopped paying the maintenance/rent on the apartment—-so the arrears were $2400—-as the rent was $200—-and the fool couldn’t pay it on time AND still get $800 from me. Which goes to teach that poverty-Welfare as a mindset goes into impulse control and financial mis-management. I was literally the perfect set up.

Through the ensuing court struggle with the NYCHA Co-Op Board of the building we worked out I would pay the list price—-$400 a month for the last 3 months of the fake 2 year lease after having paid a 1 year lease. Yes, Janet was on Welfare and still getting the Welfare monies for her and her kids and Food Stamps—-because she still had the Manhattan address. PLUS my $1000.

Fresh Direct delivered groceries every 6 weeks plus light carried groceries were my biggest issue after having the movers bring my stuff there. When I moved—-I’ve had the same mover for over 10 years—-Andrew and his team—-he’d taught me how to pack—-140 smaller banker boxes of books plus furniture and they did like a relay system to get everything out in like an hour.

Once a nurse’s aide with an old man had gotten him to the 3rd floor landing but he couldn’t go another farther so I was helping him walk up the stairs—-and finally it was easier to just pick him up and carry him to the 6th floor. It made no sense to be an elderly building and not install the elevator that older buildings have for $10 to 25k—-the building full of the elderly.

It was a safe quiet building, I liked it. I moved to a bigger place in Washington Heights, but I’ve stayed in the neighborhood because other than the apartment court drama, I never had any problems and just took my time with all the stairs.

#KylePhoenix

#TheKylePhoenixShow

Why are so many men attracted to trans women? by Kyle Phoenix

They’re called skoliosexuals. It is a defined sexuality. Sexuality generally encompasses Sex (what a person biologically is), Gender (what a person presents as based upon social conventions) and Sexuality (what a person identifies as and enacts as an expression). What a person is or is attracted to is a some total of those three in a myriad of personal combinations. Think of it like a slot machine with all the Sexes (21 biologically), Genders (63 because not every identity is within a Western context—-there are hundreds of cultures and therefore social expressions and norms throughout humanity) and then Sexuality (which is nuanced and personal and biological, social and spiritual/mental.

Trans women represent both positive, and advantageous, negative traits-outcomes:

  • Positively there is a deeper awareness of men, being around men and boys growing up, from the trans person. Trans people can therefore, going from male to female or being non-binary, but having been biologically and gender identified/designated as male, know men better than women do. There are two social/gender enclaves—-male/female—-that overlap but are clearly different in social mores.
  • Negatively they are accommodating to skoliosexuals so that there is no greater social demand of an equitable relationship because the skoliosexual can, if male presenting, take social advantage of being socially acceptable as a man, whereas the trans person may not. This means that a man can have his satisfaction without responsibility.
  • Positively most humans are not wholly heterosexual. What we are is socialized in a heterosexual framework on top of our inherent sexuality. Imagine this—-we’ve never deeply interviewed people who don’t make it to sexual maturity, or die before losing their virginity; we also don’t interview people who don’t have children about their sexuality—-we assume as they present as what they are, that is in truth what they are. Consider that children and non-asked adults—-may not all be hetero. Now add into that people who come from socially or religiously rigid cultures now—-Africa, the Middle East, South America—-tens, hundreds of millions, that might have no choice but to be heterosexual for survival and personal safety. Freedom of sexuality expression is not unique to human history but it is propagated and protected far more, far deeper in current Westernized cultures recently because sexuality expression has followed identity expressionpolitical expression, which is baked into ideas of democracy. Freer countries have freer people. All of this I say to suggest that 10% of the population falling into LGBTSGL identity frameworks, is probably light—-it’s probably close to double or a third of humanity—-25% to 30%—-but a billion people don’t get to express themselves clearly. We don’t know what EVERYONE is. Which means that tens of millions, hundreds of millions of men, have not been able to define their sexuality. We’re literally seeing the tip of the iceberg.
  • Negatively skoliosexuals, being unique to the accepting mass of men, means that skoliosexuals are a premium mating group for non-binary/trans folk. Which means they, by virtue of numbers, of clearer sexuality identity, can be pickier and are rarer. Rarer than non-binary/trans folk.
  • Positively skoliosexuals are accepting at what a hetero or non-hetero person towards a trans/non-binary person might find confusing or off-putting. It is the inter-meshing of sex and gender that is the attraction to a skoliosexual. What we consider confusion, the skoliosexual considers acceptable.
  • Negatively because of their compatibility rarity they can press a trans/non-binary person to do as he demands. Acceptance is traded for control. The skoliosexual can then push another human to do as they will—-which might mean encouraging or discouraging healthy transitioning or sexual reassignment. A trans person is deeply seeking both harmony to self and acceptance from others so a skoliosexual can take advantage of that dissonance and low self esteem.
  • Positively for the skoliosexual is the availability of sex. femininity, intimacy. A skoliosexual knows that someone considered on the margins of society will not be able to maintain the same strictures of women who are biologically born as women. They will never have that level of leverage—-primarily because of the priceless commodity that women provide—-whether it’s to royal families or slavery—-children (which equals legacy.) A trans female is almost everything, but/or many things, but, a dead end, sexually-progenationally speaking. But to the skoliosexual and his sexuality, this has the benefit of there not being the threat/responsibility of pregnancy. What that lack of attachment does is it gives the skoliosexual the right-ability to leave at any time based upon emotion, not legality or legal progeny responsibility. in many ways his resources, his lineage, anything he owns or has amassed, is in no way threatened by a paternity or palimony laws/lawsuit as it is with a biological woman.
  • Negatively a skoliosexual is constantly trying to define for themselves and publicly, that their interest in trans/non-binary folk is hetero in perspective but not homosexual in execution nor nature. It then directly challenges genitalia meaning anything to sexuality. Genitalia then means/matters to Sex identification but not execution of actions with said genitalia. Which of course upends how people who believe-ascribe their sexuality to genitalia think believe their identity to be secured. The skoliosexual is then put in, for himself, or as an example to the larger society, a form of upset, greater than upset and confusion—-discombobulation and deep dissonance—-because it then suggests that how we have perceived ourselves and others is mutable, perhaps even arbitrary.
  • But to piggyback off of a positive-negative and a negative-positive from the above, the skoliosexual—-perhaps not accepted in the wider society to be out about his sexuality can use and maintain and demand a level of discretion, if not outright secrecy from the trans person because to associate him to the person would be a reduction in his social power and standing as a man. Again, he gets his satisfaction and power too.
  • Negatively the trans person gets to perpetuate their own sense of being in the margins of society—-one way, another way, neither accepted. And, as with many humans, trans and non-binary folk can before comfortable with not being in equality-equitable relationships—-it serves their unhealthy (re)trauma from a society that may shun them.

Women demand in action, form, progeny and even legally, that men step up, are responsible for their relationships. Whether that be as simply as an expectation towards engagement and marriage or as lengthy as child support. If one can understand self-definition of one’s sexuality as skoliosexuality—-it doesn't obviate being with biological women, it just adds another Sex where there is less social responsibility. and that person is attuned to the skoliosexuals desires.

The skoliosexual gets to have a relationship, as a man with a socially presenting woman—-or to him privately, presenting woman—-without the social ramifications of genitalia from society.

#KylePhoenix

#TheKylePhoenixShow


https://amzn.to/40XVQMY


https://amzn.to/40XVQMY

Do black people see all the phenomena in life through a lens of race? by Kyle Phoenix

 

Yes, but that was the point. I teach so people present to me, often, misinformed opinions and ideas, particularly about themselves, race, people down the block, the intentionality of people.

The intention of the design of race was that you and I believe in and perpetuate the idea of racialization of people so that it could be used to affect and effect economic concerns. It’s not personal but it personally affects and effects people who are colored and is designed favor those not as colored by melanin.

That’s pretty much it in a nutshell.

Current statistics—-Black people in America, 93% of them believe in Blackness—-that they are Black.

Blackness was an original segregating design from White people. To essentially union bust when folk were indentured servants. All God’s chillun were indentured servants in the late 1400 to 1500s and had done their damndest to get here, to America under contracts, to the land owning gentry—-to work farms. But then them indentured servants, all ethnicities, from all over the world, started to see the imbalance in their station—-usually a 10 year contract and the land ownership. So the gentry, in control of setting laws, created a legal system that allowed several things:

  1. You could kill people, who were not White in complexion, and not be charged with murder…because…
  2. People who were not White in complexion and ethnic origin, were considered non-White or Black, or a degree of Black.
  3. People designated Black had no rights—-to own property, to hold sizeable money, to harm or steal from those designated “White”. Their rights were stripped by first equating them to not being human and then because they wer eobviously homo sapiens, designating that they were 3/5s of human. Which seems ludicrous but you have to allow for the limited education of the populace. While there may have been initially thousands and then millions of people, to the 1900s only 25% were educated to what we would consider Middle School/reading level—-which worldwide is why religion took such hold. Priests or here, social architects—-politicians were educated and therefore “translated” for the common populace.
  4. Only White people could own land and companies, and as non-White people were not considered people by the law, but closer to animals, people of color could not own property but could be owned as property.

What the above did was do two important things—-it immediately segregated indentured folk—-who were essentially starting what we would call a union AND it advanced the White wealth building/land ownership, a pathway out of being an indentured servant, for White people. You had a future of land ownership, if you were White, and didn’t have to worry about the competition of anyone who wasn’t.

And # 5—-it then by default, legalized and sanctioned the Transatlantic Slave Trade as a capitalistic business practice to obtain people and bring them, as salable property, to Europe, the Caribbean, and North and South America.

And it worked. That’s what most people forget—-it WORKED. Well, it didn’t work out, not for everyone…but the people it didn’t work for, weren’t even legally people…so it worked for those who the law designated as people—-and by counting a colored person as 3/5s of a person then the gentry… eventually metastasizing into the rich and including politicians, could have sway over the congregate US Government by citizenry count.

That meant from the 1400s to the 1500s until the first direct slaves arrived in the early 1600s, the system of Blackness was being designed. (Which is where we get that throwaway calculation of 400 years of slavery from. It took time to set up the entirety of the system, even in a new, smaller populated America.)

But what this did through those years, through the civil War and through Jim Crow-segregation and then into the shift of the Civil Rights Amendments——was it inculcated the concept of Blackness…to Black people.

I illustrate it to my students very, very graphically.

By law, Bible (a form of ersatz education AND deified moral superiority), and gun, White people—-their designed System, designated people of color as Black (when they were being kind instead of colored or nigger)—-when they were trying to have polite legal and social language. You can compare this to one majority group, designating a minority group as the “Cunt People”. For hundreds of years in social circles, in newspapers, books, the court system on and on and on and on—-The Cunt People. And then in the 1960s/1970s, achieving legal changes—-those people of color said we refute this system of marginalization: “And hereby designate ourselves—-The Cunt People! We’re cunt and we’re proud!”

There has been much debate and shifting from nigger to Negro to Colored to Afro American to African American to even Africanist—-but through those shifts has existed a blanket descriptor Black—-even adopted by the people it was first stamped upon.

The issue with that is it is very hard to use as your team name a designation that was your slur name. In many ways, Black (ened) people identify with a slurring of their identity. There is no Black country, nor Black cities, no Black language—-there are adoptions and approximations and even casual lingua but not official state sanctioned as Black. There are places and bits and pieces and cultural points that we recognize with the labelling of Black but it is a holdover designation, a flattening. Ironically, just as White is (as “White” flattens and denies Irish, Italian, Polish, etc.—-the one exception being Jewish—-but those are ethnicities and cultures, Jewish being a culture and a religion. Yes, all these designation—-higher or lower, sub or not, confusing, because the social constructing of race, confused ethnicity and culture—-muted them in many ways, for the designations.)

So 93% in 2022 accept the designation of Black and the hodge podge that is. And that hodge podging colors perception because it colors reception—-receptivity of the person themselves. They are similar/fit the designations attributes so the person, without ability to refute, is so designated. And more directly because they are so designated before correction or negotiation, in order to live, survive, thrive, move through the world with its’ lawful applications with boxes to be checked off that are linked to employment, money, political power—-one must re-enforce-accept said designation.

One becomes Blackened because the society around one blackens you and therefore, at least 93% of Black folk, clutch to Black for that reason and the cultural history.

Blackness & Boxes

I was having a discussion with a coworker and we were talking about another conversation I had with a group/class about their push for the ancient Egyptians, I’m talking about pharaohs—-to their being “Black”.

It’s a big thing online—-the attachment, attribution of now to then——40000 to 6000 years ago. The pictures of Egyptians are lightened or darkened and their knowledge of science and math and engineering and architecture is bandied about and connected, across those thousands of years to the Blacks of today, in the 21st century.

My refuting point, was not the accomplishment and history of the Egyptians, but that several contextualizations did not fit and therefore were ultimately undermining to the intent of the attempted connection.

  1. Most of the slaves transported form the Transatlantic Slave Trade did not come from Egypt.

You can clearly see that the people who were enslaved came from Western Africa. And more importantly during the centuries of the Transatlantic Slave Trade—-Egypt was going through its own deep drama—-first with plagues then several famines—-decimating more than half of the population and then struggles with occupation and control by the Ottoman Empire—-which is why there is a shuffle/drama to the control-idea of whether Egypt is an African country or Middle Eastern one. During the TAST—-Egypt was engaged in struggles with non-European powers though it did trade with European powers. And essentially from an enslaver point of view, one doesn’t go and capture, to sell humans, who are carriers of very obvious disease/death and embroiled in a conflict with another/several world powers-empires.

We, American descendants of Africans—-yes, but not Egyptians.

Deeper, to identify with the past Egyptians, all the way back to the pharaohs is dangerous to legal and social liberation in the 21st century.

The pyramids were built, not by unions, nor well paid and cared for employees—-but by slaves, enslaved people. They were used as labor to create pyramids (the equivalency of modern day skyscrapers) for that times uber-rich folk. For a few of them to occupy, be buried in and keep their wealth in.

The pharaohs were some of the first, deeply organized enslavers.

This in no way takes away from their architectural skill, engineering skill, organizational skill or wealth. But if we attach Blackness to them it’s deeply problematic.

Blackness is a construct of not science, as race is not a matter of science—-it is a social construct—-them gentry laying it down to divide and conquer the indentured servitude and create a controllable economic source in specific people. But this was done thousands of years after the reign of the pharaohs. To connect, deeply, deeply misinformed in thought then to modern day, present Blacks, is to perhaps open—-in this insane connection—-that Blacks are the original enslavers—-because the Egyptians were your ancestors, right? “So it’s only fair play/karma and even Biblical retribution, that you people, their descendants, ended up slaves too—-after what you did to each other.”

We want nothing of that conflated rhetoric.

Now, we have separate, substantial cases of two separate peoples, thousands of years apart, experiencing one of the most common human experiences—-slavery/enslavement. But we, descendants of slaves are from Angolan, Biafran, Benin, etc. origin………and there’s nothing wrong with that. These places have rich, deep histories and offerings to the world stage.

But the flattening of people in the Americas to Black, by racialization, has taught Black people to flatten not just Whites but other peoples—-so African, Africans are flattened to AFRICA as one big country—-and Egypt as the chosen one, the brightest one——liked claiming in a thousand years we’re all descended from BeyoncĂ©—-to get celebrated credit——- to have originated from.

Why the Black folks doing this, Kyle?

What racialization has done for Black people in America is given us an identity when all of our identity was stripped away.

  • It is problematic to be American because America substantiated, profited and encouraged racialized discrimination.
  • Human was originally written out so that has been a 400 year struggle to change the legal definition of within the American legal system.
  • Science has just arrived at the capability to detail the origin of Black people in America to African countries on the West Coast of Africa genetically. But of approximate 50 million people only a fraction have done genetic background work mainly from disinterest and cost.
  • 93% default to the concept of Blackness. Which I would allude to as a form of brainwashing-propaganda-PTSD with a healthy dose of Stockholm Syndrome. We have embraced the Patty Hearst of Blackness to survive. If someone holding a gun on you, figuratively and literally says you’re duck—-quack. But if for 12 to 15 generations guns have been held on your family, every single day, in every single way—-you probably quack out of habit. We co-conspire out of first necessity and now habit to assume the nominations by the dominant culture.

To answer the question of whether or not we, as a mass group, see reality through the perception of race, specifically, racialization—-yeah, but about 7% of us don’t.

#KylePhoenix

#ThekylePhoenixShow