They’re called skoliosexuals. It is a defined sexuality. Sexuality generally encompasses Sex (what a person biologically is), Gender (what a person presents as based upon social conventions) and Sexuality (what a person identifies as and enacts as an expression). What a person is or is attracted to is a some total of those three in a myriad of personal combinations. Think of it like a slot machine with all the Sexes (21 biologically), Genders (63 because not every identity is within a Western context—-there are hundreds of cultures and therefore social expressions and norms throughout humanity) and then Sexuality (which is nuanced and personal and biological, social and spiritual/mental.
Trans women represent both positive, and advantageous, negative traits-outcomes:
- Positively there is a deeper awareness of men, being around men and boys growing up, from the trans person. Trans people can therefore, going from male to female or being non-binary, but having been biologically and gender identified/designated as male, know men better than women do. There are two social/gender enclaves—-male/female—-that overlap but are clearly different in social mores.
- Negatively they are accommodating to skoliosexuals so that there is no greater social demand of an equitable relationship because the skoliosexual can, if male presenting, take social advantage of being socially acceptable as a man, whereas the trans person may not. This means that a man can have his satisfaction without responsibility.
- Positively most humans are not wholly heterosexual. What we are is socialized in a heterosexual framework on top of our inherent sexuality. Imagine this—-we’ve never deeply interviewed people who don’t make it to sexual maturity, or die before losing their virginity; we also don’t interview people who don’t have children about their sexuality—-we assume as they present as what they are, that is in truth what they are. Consider that children and non-asked adults—-may not all be hetero. Now add into that people who come from socially or religiously rigid cultures now—-Africa, the Middle East, South America—-tens, hundreds of millions, that might have no choice but to be heterosexual for survival and personal safety. Freedom of sexuality expression is not unique to human history but it is propagated and protected far more, far deeper in current Westernized cultures recently because sexuality expression has followed identity expression, political expression, which is baked into ideas of democracy. Freer countries have freer people. All of this I say to suggest that 10% of the population falling into LGBTSGL identity frameworks, is probably light—-it’s probably close to double or a third of humanity—-25% to 30%—-but a billion people don’t get to express themselves clearly. We don’t know what EVERYONE is. Which means that tens of millions, hundreds of millions of men, have not been able to define their sexuality. We’re literally seeing the tip of the iceberg.
- Negatively skoliosexuals, being unique to the accepting mass of men, means that skoliosexuals are a premium mating group for non-binary/trans folk. Which means they, by virtue of numbers, of clearer sexuality identity, can be pickier and are rarer. Rarer than non-binary/trans folk.
- Positively skoliosexuals are accepting at what a hetero or non-hetero person towards a trans/non-binary person might find confusing or off-putting. It is the inter-meshing of sex and gender that is the attraction to a skoliosexual. What we consider confusion, the skoliosexual considers acceptable.
- Negatively because of their compatibility rarity they can press a trans/non-binary person to do as he demands. Acceptance is traded for control. The skoliosexual can then push another human to do as they will—-which might mean encouraging or discouraging healthy transitioning or sexual reassignment. A trans person is deeply seeking both harmony to self and acceptance from others so a skoliosexual can take advantage of that dissonance and low self esteem.
- Positively for the skoliosexual is the availability of sex. femininity, intimacy. A skoliosexual knows that someone considered on the margins of society will not be able to maintain the same strictures of women who are biologically born as women. They will never have that level of leverage—-primarily because of the priceless commodity that women provide—-whether it’s to royal families or slavery—-children (which equals legacy.) A trans female is almost everything, but/or many things, but, a dead end, sexually-progenationally speaking. But to the skoliosexual and his sexuality, this has the benefit of there not being the threat/responsibility of pregnancy. What that lack of attachment does is it gives the skoliosexual the right-ability to leave at any time based upon emotion, not legality or legal progeny responsibility. in many ways his resources, his lineage, anything he owns or has amassed, is in no way threatened by a paternity or palimony laws/lawsuit as it is with a biological woman.
- Negatively a skoliosexual is constantly trying to define for themselves and publicly, that their interest in trans/non-binary folk is hetero in perspective but not homosexual in execution nor nature. It then directly challenges genitalia meaning anything to sexuality. Genitalia then means/matters to Sex identification but not execution of actions with said genitalia. Which of course upends how people who believe-ascribe their sexuality to genitalia think believe their identity to be secured. The skoliosexual is then put in, for himself, or as an example to the larger society, a form of upset, greater than upset and confusion—-discombobulation and deep dissonance—-because it then suggests that how we have perceived ourselves and others is mutable, perhaps even arbitrary.
- But to piggyback off of a positive-negative and a negative-positive from the above, the skoliosexual—-perhaps not accepted in the wider society to be out about his sexuality can use and maintain and demand a level of discretion, if not outright secrecy from the trans person because to associate him to the person would be a reduction in his social power and standing as a man. Again, he gets his satisfaction and power too.
- Negatively the trans person gets to perpetuate their own sense of being in the margins of society—-one way, another way, neither accepted. And, as with many humans, trans and non-binary folk can before comfortable with not being in equality-equitable relationships—-it serves their unhealthy (re)trauma from a society that may shun them.
Women demand in action, form, progeny and even legally, that men step up, are responsible for their relationships. Whether that be as simply as an expectation towards engagement and marriage or as lengthy as child support. If one can understand self-definition of one’s sexuality as skoliosexuality—-it doesn't obviate being with biological women, it just adds another Sex where there is less social responsibility. and that person is attuned to the skoliosexuals desires.
The skoliosexual gets to have a relationship, as a man with a socially presenting woman—-or to him privately, presenting woman—-without the social ramifications of genitalia from society.
#KylePhoenix
#TheKylePhoenixShow
https://amzn.to/40XVQMY
No comments:
Post a Comment