Showing posts with label Madonna. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Madonna. Show all posts

Sunday, March 5, 2023

Is Madonna right to accuse mockery of her appearance on the 2023 Grammys as "misogynistic and ageist"? by #KylePhoenix

The problem with this idea, the question, the projection, Madonna, all of it——is that it’s through a warped lens—-much like race. I was recently watching a group of folk discussing race and colorism and it occurred to me, how I’ve thought this before, but in projecting myself onto the panel—-realized they were trying to make logical sense of an insane system.

Madonna is in an insane system.

So for the past 50 years—-including her teen years and then magnified in her twenties when she became famous, she’s been inundated by these beauty standards and expectations. Say it was at a Level 4, and then she got famous, more and more, as a decade went by so that by the time she was say 30—-it was at a Level 14. The normal woman in America/world society probably hovers at a 5 to 7, in terms of beauty standards, self-regard.

Now yearly, Madonna sits down and talks to lawyers, record executives, etc. and they examine some of the past and project to the future. But in general, numbers start coming up.

  • 300 million records sold
  • $500 to $700 million in personal fortune.
  • Billions earned for Warner Brothers.

I was watching an interview with Oprah and she was walking around her West Hollywood offices and there were all these posters and framed pictures of her and then I saw another interview of her at her former Harpo Studios—and it dawned on me—-an odd question—-what the fuck is that like? BLOWN up pictures of you——everywhere. Then TV images, then print pictures, then magazine pictures and on and on and on and on. And photoshoots. Have you ever noticed how many freaking pictures celebrities take?

I have a Madonna mash up video this guy made sort of tracing her career from beginning to now in about 8 minutes of the song. There are a LOT of pictures. There are so many pictures, that I’ve never seen before, that I wonder how many pictures I haven’t seen.

Now flipside it———-imagine being Madonna and having seen every single one of these approved pictures—-the photoshoots, the videos, the films, the interviews?

When we look back on the psyche/personal effect of the 20th to 21st century—-Fame and the Internet—- will be the biggest psychic bombs. On one level she’s in a business and has turned the business/agreed to it, as a projection of herself. And been successful at it. She’s also made a career or dressed a career by changing her image——her appearance, to the rest of us—-trying out new looks at such. She’s turned herself into sort of a template to try out all of these possibilities, combinations of hair, face, make-up, clothing, ideas——and unlike most women, who age and maintain a similar appearance, she has the resources in money, clothing and people, to be vastly diverse.

Most women only “change” with age and then a few creative changes of hair color, new make up, time, injury. It is unusual for a human being to change through intervention of both design, style and even yes, some science.

But there are only say, a thousand of us on the planet, being offered directly or indirectly, MILLIONS of DOLLARS, to make these constant changes, constantly.

Personalize It

Many of us, male and female, due to family, time and work, gain weight. I would then offer/argue, that the benefits of work make us spend more hours there, at a desk or company, eating unhealthily, rather than exercising for hours on end through the majority of our lifetime.

We kind of get paid to be capable of work yes, but also to be present and therefore, to trade that potentially incredible healthiness, for money. We also trade time to be with family, raise children properly, so we don’t always have time to, again, super duper, exercise.

65% of Americas are obese. Two thirds. Because of time, work, eating habits, choices.

But Madonna is in pretty good shape because she, being Madonna, is more than her job, her work is more than her Life’s Purpose—-she is her Life’s Purpose——and part of the Madonna “brand” is change, diversity, experimentation, pushing margins and boundaries. Most people, one don’t know their life’s purpose, and two, maybe only a few dozen people ARE their Life’s Purpose, in such a monumental way. And I think that monumentalism is from their work projection to the rest of us.

Madonna therefore IMPACTS us differently than Susan down at Target. Beyond like or dislike, she’s part, a large swatch, of our realty fabric so her visage/body is in like this dualistic symbiosis with our own projections of our images of Madonna. And we’re comparing all of that bullshit to our internalized ideas of women, age, what is “appropriate for women”, what’s right, etc..

I personally have never been outraged or particularly shocked or aghast and judgmental of her—-she’s not THAT extreme to me, but I have liberated and libertine sensibilities. The ONLY time that I was like—-oh, ok, Madonna—-was during her Sex book campaign when she was strolling up a Miami Boulevard naked—-bush out. I thought that was audacious—-not for her or a woman—-but for a celebrity. But I’ve seen plenty of bushes before so I wasn’t aghast. lol

So we have Susan from Target or our mom or sister or wife or rando women, in comparison to Madonna, who is unique in that she has resources and control and experimentation with her appearance/identity, and is handsomely rewarded for it.

We do arrive to Madonna with our social issues and mental maladies of racism, sexism and ageism. We try to force something bigger than a normal human’s—-reality identity?—-I don’t even know how to completely contextualize “not Madonna”. She’s in rooms, with teams of people, creative people, thinking differently about Self, about being a woman, about time, about age than your mom or Susan at Target, behind the cash register.

She’s also used to attention in a much different way than most are. She’s at a place where attention for her is not fuel like it is for the majority, it’s more of a malleable medium—-she controls how she is seen to a greater degree than Susan. But she can shift, but not control, the way the lens—-the minds—of those viewing her—- are, what they think about broad things, like women as a space and age as a context.

I think she’s high end, higher space seeing, right there is a projection upon her about what she “should” look like and be based upon how many “Susan’s” we’re normally surrounded by or are.

The above female Target workers are women, some closer to her age range, but they don’t have the resources or lack of physical stressors or ability to eschew that which is unhealthy for them by whim. Perhaps what Madonna is unintentionally showing us—-is one, the future. as people have more time and resources—-the masses reduction of being trans will be Self Design——in more options, colors, diversity etc. and that will mean what it means to be a woman will change dramatically, because of what longer lifespans and more resources will mean to age.

The projection is that those born in the approximate 1960s will be able to live with healthy interventions past 100, and those born past 2000 will live over 125 years.

I personally plan to “retire”, barring illness or injury, in my late 80s——as a Columbia professor did so at 88—-so I’m thinking 90 is when I might go—-”Wow, I’m old!” but I don’t know if other than moving physically slower and not wearing thongs, will I ascribe to minimizing myself mentally due to age. But my Self Reality isn’t based on my physicality, so I can accept that will decline. I’m more my mind than my own attractiveness/beauty/appeal/youngevity as Madonna is, must be, seems to like being, and has certainly profited from.

Madonna, barring some surprising illness or accident, has another 20+ healthy years, particularly from her resources and ability to engage the cutting edge. She’s further along than the majority of women so she probably perceives women as far more advanced and autonomous than most women do of even themselves—-we tend to see people as we see ourselves, or the potentiality of them as ourselves. And yes, that includes like men pop Viagra for hard-ons, she has popped some Botox to tighten something here and there, and there because her industry—-of Madonna—-depends on being Madonna.

This is Bette Davis at the same age.

This is 64.

This is 64.

This is 64.

This is 64.

This is 64 that we’re more accustomed to seeing when the person is not an industry. Madonna’s point about aging within fame and the undertones of her having resources to change what she will, is really what this is about. Age is changing, women have varying resources now and therefore will have various expressions of that physically…….and we’re all perceiving celebrities through multiple, insane, warped lens to begin with. I would argue that Fame is both becoming the epitome and removal, from normal society in a self-consuming way.

Profile photo for Kyle Phoenix

It’s kind of good. I was just laying in bed, cuddled with my wealth of pillows and comforters and thinking on what my next moves were going to be. Two books had arrived from the printer (of course there are minor corrections, but that’s to be expected.)

Rewind.

I was on the #5 bus headed up Broadway to the post office to pick up this box of books. And since it was just a short jaunt of a few blocks, I had my phablet and was listening to music but hadn’t brought along a book. So I was thinking.

I was thinking about a past relationship and as I am inclined to do—-getting a little steamed about the thought, person, argument. Replaying it in my head and looking at it from a new angle—-which was spurred by a spontaneous dinner with a colleague a few weeks ago and she’d asked me about my dating life, as we’d talked about hers. I laughingly told her a comment a guy had made, judgmental but complimentary, yet it had taken me a couple of years past the relationship, to realize he meant that he was intimidated by me. It didn’t help that my bus ride, weeks later, was to pick up a book that had included bits and pieces of that relationship, fictionalized.

This is why said gumball was rolling around at the back of my mind. I get to the post office——frightened there will be a long line in the middle of the afternoon—-no line! I wait maybe 30 seconds and hand my slip to the attendant and a minute later have this huge box in my tote bag. I open it in the park across the street and the books are brand new and sexy and pretty and heavy and smell good and when I page flip, the text is crisp and visible.

I start smiling and beaming, overjoyed.

I realized, running mentally through past classmates and friends and folk who wanted to be writers that I’m standing here with more of my books, adding to the passel selling around the world. I’m not just blooming with gratitude and joy, I’m grateful that I’m not living the tortured life of some other folk.

I made a decision over 10 years ago to step out of the matrix known as Corporate America——having done financial work, securities litigation work, a host of things, a strong resume——for education and then used my time to control my schedule and to simply write.

Write, I do.

When I was young, scoring 6,7,8 grades ahead of my own peers on Standardized tests and imagining what I might be interested in, I was writing. I never took my writing “business” seriously so after undergrad I went into companies because they were “serious business”. You get to go up in the elevator and you have a desk—-that one!—-and it’s yours and you decorate it. Eventually I didn’t decorate as much because I was consulting so there were time limits on how long I would be there. I made it a point to not get comfortable. To not make that part of my identity. For about 10 years or so I didn’t know what the alternative to that corporate identity was….because I liked business, liked the intricacy of it, had owned several businesses as a child/teenager.

I even had friends/schoolmates who sailed into CA, never to be heard from again…..until I saw FB pics or them on the street—-fatter, a lot less hair. I realized they had a desk and probably decorated it, perhaps even the Holy Grail——an office—-a room, a little room in a bigger office, that is yours, but not really yours.

But I get to—-write even this blog post—-write a novel most of my working time, my work now taking up about 5 hours of active working. The other 35 is my writing Kyle stuff. I’ve been offered several promotions, could get all ambitious and hungry, and play dirty games……but I can literally feel the days, the hours, when I write less at work. When work takes up too much of my attention away from my Life’s Purpose.

I’m living and creating my Life’s Purpose. Yes, I know when I die, but I often think about what happens if I die this year? To the books? The TV show? I then think in production plans and product plans, I have to make an Exit Strategy plan for me, in case of death.

I used to think my giftedness meant I could do anything, that I could simply focus and learn and master anything—-which I sort of can. Which for awhile provided a whole range of possibilities.

Then I found this one, good thing to do well, very well, and it all clicked.

I’m walking down Amsterdam, swinging my tote bag full of books I’ve written, good books, and I’m beaming like the sun. I start to think of the ex and friends, near and far, and how they’re going to that desk, maybe in an office, inside of a bigger office, and how I’ve made the conscious choice not to.

It’s not what I expected, but I am happier with myself, little ol’ me.

#KylePhoenix

#TheKylePhoenixShow

Sunday, October 28, 2018

How does an INTJ recover from a breakup? Answered by Kyle Phoenix

Kyle Phoenix
Kyle Phoenix, I have written dozens of books, taught thousands of relationship workshops.
I concur with inner sadness. Something weird I've discovered recently.
I love them, sometimes more when I'm done. It's like I did fifty points of love with them, break up and I still have seventy points left and I have to expend those points. I also miss the close friendship. I think the other guy or girl is hurt, exasperated, trying to get my attention: "I say ok, no more romance....do you still want to go to Aruba? Since we're single, maybe we'll both get lucky."
And they're aghast.
I'm like, the romantic feelings are capped but that doesn't mean I don't like you or even love you still. Aruba?
Break up seems to mean dead to people. Which I don't get. Like building a house then abandoning it. I'm like I have plenty of love acreage for plenty of houses! Which I guess trivializes the other, huh?
Once, I threw a guy out and within twelve hours called a casual ex over for sex to confirm that it was the other ex who was bad at sex, not me. Confirmed, it was him.

I seem to attract the kind who "will talk to you in time" after a break up and I'm normal the next day. I think not only am I open to polyamory but I don't have a love shut off. I have done the whole bad singing under the window serenading, floral bouquets, paintings, thousand dollar romantic dinner, a coworker talked me out of a BMW on a exes birthday—-I was going to have it parked in front of his house with a giant red bow—- but then my mental files are so thorough it messes them up that I was so good and accurate to them.
I've tried to seek out more emotionally attaching folk but hungry, greedy and crazy are in abundance amongst men and women.
My detachment seems to draw them in, perhaps the intensity in seeing is there attempt to pierce and then I reciprocate and they freak out and bolt.
Break ups for me are confusing, I've elected to focus on my work for awhile, it always suffers or I minimize it to accommodate mates.
I'm of the thought now of children yes and make enough money to buy a partner where it's all laid out with financial agreements and incentives....and structures for breaking up.
You know who I envy? This is silly————-but Madonna and her boy toys.
Do your life work, raise your kids, hire a bf for a year or two, keep it moving. I like the intjness of it.

www.kylephoenix.com

Smile, Kyle
KylePhoenixShow@Gmail.com
#KylePhoenix
Kyle Phoenix Answers



You can Like or; Follow Us on Facebook or;Twitter

Or Click Below to:
·                     Kyle Phoenix Website
·                     The Kyle Phoenix Blog
·                     Check out Kyle Phoenix Products on Amazon .com


Friday, January 17, 2014

My Art, Madonna, Vin Diesel and Stanley Kubrick, Part 3 by Kyle Phoenix




I'm always interested in how to interpret Art, with a Big A and whether I'm doing it---though I think when you're really creating stuff, you're not that interested in discussing art and doing it, you want to more of discuss the creative process, the work in detail than art as a Self.  That's kind of how I always judge pretension when I'm (trapped) with a group of writers.  I was often in undergraduate college writing classes trapped with the most pretentious sometimes creative drivel and spurts of truly good Art lost to meandering, mental masturbation.  I think of this now as I write, having a conduit to getting just about all of my work published in some form or fashion.  I think of this as everyone has a level of access to the public audience sphere with the internet; I say this having survived a few Facebook writer's groups.

Okay, just as a side rant---vampires, zombies, werewolves, fairies, superheroes, magicians, detectives and varying combinations<<<Fifty Shades of Grey
(no, much like Harry Potter and Twilight and the Hunger Games---I have avoided all in print and film versions, barring long term hospitalization and an inability to roll my bed or chair away from screenings of such fare---I probably won't see them...though I kind of like Jennifer Lawrence....so maybe one day)---all three of hers) and the combinations pretty much fall into those areas.  I asked one group about their minority or LGBT characters and the silence was deafening and then the slow ebbing to the shores vitriol started.  But no real literature is being produced, no really good stuff.  (Game of Thrones ain't helping newbie White writers either...)
The ability to self publish has eliminated people truly working at an Art or a craft.  I thought this reading samples (and teaching writing classes) and thinking how it  took me a decade of constant writing to be good enough for my mentors to say, yes it would happen but not yet in my early twenties.  I remember a fellow student being immediately pushed by a mentoring professor to his own publishing house and I was referred to another professor, another school with a smaller publishing house.  I was good but I wasn't ready.  Though the other guy, married with kids had more life experience and from what I remember disease and poverty---just a shittier life than me---so maybe more Art.  Though I was ready a few years after that, I took my time, focusing on learning about business and honing a stronger writing voice, editing, dabbling in new things before I published a collection of short stories.

Now the Black folk it's more of relationship based---men and women and sometimes tawdry relationships or wrestling with the church.  There's often four women going through this (Terry McMillan ruined the number of friends one needs in a book and Sex In The City sure as hell didn't help...God save us if the amateur writer discovers Ntozake Shange's For Colored Girls...) and some sort of wrongness with the men.  Now LGBT minority fiction goes all hog wild mixing up the same combinations just more oral sex and romantic yearnings from the writer's....ooops, I mean main characters.  It always works out with pith and hearts and flowers.  It's escapist fantasy work.  Nothing wrong with that, just not literature.

A few years ago I met a fellow Columbia University student while volunteering to be interviewed by elementary through high school students who was working on her thesis with Marc Lamont Hill, a professor at CU, on ghetto novels.  She was a very nice blonde haired White woman.  We had a great discussion about her work and the vision of fiction and writing that she was researching.  She'd read literally all of this genre of books and was essentially doing her project on what this meant/said about Black culture and culture as a whole.  Ill admit---I think to fall strictly into that genre---I've read maybe a handful, though I have often thought about with a more expansive budget could I use some of those books to get some of my more urban students to read more.

Then I was watching an interview of Madonna...I know, right---where is he going with this?  And she was talking about "her Art" and I was like....hmm, exactly what IS her Art?  I mean yes, there's the music and the dancing but there's so much more---writing, lyrics, performance....and I got to thinking maybe it was the Art of Identity (Changing/Presentation).  Now one my favorite Madonna works is Nothing Really Matters, particularly the video the incorporates Japanese themes.


The music video was directed by Johan Renck and filmed in January 1999 at Silvercup Studios in Long Island City, New York. The kimono Madonna wore in the video had been created by Jean-Paul Gaultier, who would later design Madonna's geisha-inspired costumes on her Drowned World Tour in 2001. Madonna later re-used the look of the video for her performance at the 41st Grammy Awards in February 1999.

According to a behind-the-scenes interview with Entertainment Tonight, Madonna stated that the inspiration behind the video was from the 1996 novel Memoirs of a Geisha. Madonna later stated; "The whole idea of a geisha is a straight metaphor for being an [entertainer] because, on one hand you're privileged to be a geisha, but on the other hand you're a prisoner [...]" Madonna also choreographed her own moves on the video, as she stated "I don't like how other people say how I should move, I'm my own best choreographer."
Synopsis

The video opens with an empty room with a fish painting, then shows Madonna holding to what looks like a baby but is actually a bag of water meant to symbolize all that is materialistic, and alternately in a red and black kimono dancing to the song.Then, a scene features a group of white-clad Swedes of Asian heritage, who walk down a dark hallway. As Madonna sings the song in a black kimono, she grips onto the bag of water.

When the chorus starts, it features Madonna in a red kimono while dancing to the song. Scene's like this carry on through the rest of the song. There are multiple scenes of Japanese people dancing to the song, performing butoh dance moves while it was shot in the decommissioned R1 Reactor below the Royal Institute of Technology in central Stockholm. The ending scene has Madonna sitting while someone is painting her back and slowly rests her body on the group. It finishes with Madonna in her red kimono walking towards the camera as it slowly descends away from her.







I actually featured the video and butoh dancers and dancing on The Kyle Phoenix TV Show (I also did several other unaired episodes, one was on Beyonce's video Get Me Bodied and it's relationship to the Rich Man's Fug from Sweet Charity and Bob Fosse's work) because I was so fascinated by it as a complete musical and video concept.  I've done some performance art---in a variety of clothing, male and female, and nudity in a concept piece of Fascism Vs. Fashion and the inter-relationship.  Maybe I'll redo it, it was quite interesting.  One would think that in a small city like Buffalo that would've been my most outlandish production...but it wasn't.  I'm very straitlaced....today but there was a time when I had to experiment with stuff.  Amazingly enough I actually produced a long form video titled Erotica before Madonna's Erotica came out and a film, The World Today (yes, named after Janet Jackson's song) that was great in concept, some filming but never went anywhere.  

However I'm easing in on at least or five more film projects in the next decade that I want to produce and direct...as I try to understand what my Art truly is.  I suppose as I write fiction (and even non-fiction) I do think about whether it translatable to a visual medium.  I recently watched Room 237 about Stanley Kubrick and The Shining, one of my favorite films---and now a true mindfuck film, as there are not one, not two, not three, not seven but perhaps 12 or more levels that man was working on in presenting that film.  Room 237 was so illuminating to stuff I completely missed that Kubrick did intentionally and stuff I caught glimpses of that it inspired me, as all Art will, to consider how to film one of my novels coming out, Hush.  Suddenly I had deep glimpses of how I could translate it---for you know---$10 million on a tight budget.  Then of course there's a film/screenplay I've been toying with for years, The Veil and another untitled film around sexuality, inspired by when I met Vin Diesel back when he was a bouncer.  I saw him a few years later at a movie screening and it sort of solidified to me that I should write up that script.  I doubt Vin will be in it---but if you know him, have him call my people! :) (Actually I know someone who dated him so I could probably, with some effort, call him myself with some effort.)

I've been painting too, just messy, messy paintings but interesting.  I have some pencil sketches that are interesting.  I explore my Art trying to narrow down what it is, all of the pieces its to become---let's not even get into my study in music and the songs I dream that I cant write down because I'm just learning to identify notes and chords.  It's a tapestry, a tapestry.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell, Book Review

 

When I consider what to review it generally happens in two ways:I look at my bookshelf and I look for something that impacts me immediately.  This book qualifies for both.  I even went so far as to stay up until 5am one morning to watch Malcolm Gladwell on CSpan give a speech about his incredible book, Outliers.  Simply put Outliers are people who through stand out from the crowd because of a talent.  It's a great system for figuring out where you are in whatever it is you like or even more importantly how to achieve (and understand others achievement).  The magic number is 10,000 hours of practice that purposefully increase sin complexity.  With just that information you can understand Bill Gates, Raymond Federman, Nina Simone, Mariah Carey, Madonna, Toni Morrison, Bill Cosby, Nikolai Tesla, Carlene Hatcher Polite, Oprah Winfrey, Ervin Laszlo and a host of others.  We look at these people as having a genius or a superior talent but we rarely consider how that talent got nurtured, developed and blossomed to what we see today.

In undergraduate college I really started getting published around the country.  For four years I was a Teacher's Asst. to three professor's, all three focusing heavily on creative writing, I took close to 80 credits of just writing classes (prose, journalism, poetry even playwriting), I was often weekly in not just the campus newspaper but the campus magazine, chapbooks and even the graduate school literary magazine.  Professors began recommending me to publishers and magazines around the country.  I even had the surprising pleasure of going into a bookstore, picking up an interesting looking magazine and finding one of my short stories in it.  Friends and classmates assumed I had some sort of dark genius that was being reaped upon the university but in fact since the age of 12 I'd been writing diligently.  For about 10 years time I'd written comic book scripts and manuscripts and poems and essays so that by the time I got to college at 21, I'd had 10 years of writing experience, my heaviest work being being done with Denise Donnelly, Debbie Freeman and Dr. William Hunter at John Jay High School.  What appeared to be an amazing well spring was in fact my arriving at college with 10,000+ hours of writing experience under my belt.  By the time I arrived at the university I was ready for high level instruction in writing because I'd mastered the basic form but to the other students who were just beginning their 10,000+ journey (if they were going to stick to it at all), I seemed far ahead.  I often felt excluded from the students' level of ability and more comfortable with the teachers because I had gathered so much more experience.  Outliers was finally able to quantify for me why.

Now transfer this algorithm to another skill, any skill, that might be achieved in college.  Working 40 hours a week is approximately 2000 hours a year.  College, full time study, is the equivalent of working full time for 4 to 5 years.  Boom!  10,000 hours.  Wait for it---now graduate school is where one achieves their "Master's" degree because you've graduate from being a novice/intermediate to now a level of mastery.  Outliers has wonderful case by case outlines of people who've attained mastery and an examination of how and why, even down to examining the preponderance of Jewish doctors and lawyers and how that can be traced back to family origin and 10,000 hours.  Use this book to examine yourself or understand how to fill in the blocks of your own study.


Remember mastery is achieved by a 6 Step Process (outlined in Mastery by Robert Greene---I'll be posting it's review as soon as it comes out in November):

1. Discover your calling: the life's task
2. Submit to reality: the ideal apprenticeship
3. Absorb the master's power: the mentor dynamic
4. See people as they are: social intelligence
5. Awaken the dimensional mind: the creative-active
6. Fuse the intuitive with the rational: mastery


Thank you!
Kyle Phoenix
kylephoenixshow@aol.com
http://kylephoenixsite.com/
Thanks and enjoy! You can Like Us/Share this post on FaceBook, LinkedIn, Google+ or Follow Us on Twitter! Don't forget to watch The Kyle Phoenix Show on Channel 56 (Time Warner), 83 (RCN), 34 (Verizon) and the Thursday/Friday 12am/midnight simulcast on http://kylephoenixsite.com/