Showing posts with label television. Show all posts
Showing posts with label television. Show all posts

Thursday, March 16, 2023

What happens when you stop watching television? by #KylePhoenix

 

Whoooooohoooooooooooooooo!

Life changes dramatically in first your attention span and patience. The Dali Lama said that the world would be radically shifted if more people learned to sit quiet for 15 minutes alone.

So I often meditate, alone, quietly. Most times I read, 5 books a week, a lot on subways as I’m traveling to and fro. But other times I simply sit calmly, hands folded and listen to my music, simply BE for the trip.

Often roommates have nervously complained, my parents did too, okay lovers as well—-that they couldn’t tell when I was home, in my bedroom, because I’m pretty quiet. It’s not like I’m tiptoeing I’m just generally writing—-I hand write all of my books first, or typing up hand written notes or reading or reading stuff online.

When I do watch Netflix or Amazon or Hulu, I tend to watch it with the subtitles on. Now, I know I’m not going deaf but I don’t like lots of loud noises, sounds, etc. and the constant barrage of music in things as well as the dubbing and sometimes speed which people speak makes reading along easier. Plus I often get a deeper meaning from the film. I also use this as a very specific, layered teaching method when I use videos in class—-it forces people to detach from becoming mentally lost or absorbed into a video. And to concretely absorb the ideas, point. Plus with undereducated folk, it shows them words, the spelling and usage and grammar or words and sentences, passively, fast. I have my students do it at home with their regular entertainment and their reading and comprehension scores skyrocket. It’s like the brain is both seeing, reading and comprehending.

That’s what I do without regular TV, people always ask——like how did you get through the war without a gun?

TV has become most people’s God. When I’m sitting on those trains, not reading sometimes, I now watch right hands full of small screens—-not even silly games as much—-watching videos—-TV as soon as they have a moment TV watching while walking. It’s got a different name——videos, streaming, etc. but it’s the same—-penis, dick, schlong—-we know what we’re talking about.

One, just as propaganda I can hear, especially as teacher, when a person watches too much TV. They sound like sound bites. They talk too fast. They’re emotions are—-stunted. I think what is happening is being fed so much information, technically more than the human brain can handle at 28 bits per second—-I have a TV show, I often contemplate experimenting with the structure of the content because sometimes I’m editing down to the half second. Yup, I could put something in that your brain would absorb but your eye wouldn’t “see”.

I think about that power and then I think about folk who would just do it…..for billions of dollars.

Two, the distorted information I see of TV when I do see snippets—-it goes too fast, they talk to fast, the speed of commercials is upsetting. But to distortion, the constant reinforcement of hegemony, of racism or misogyny of classism of hyper-consumerism. See when you watch it, you think it’s par for the course—-in faster than you can filter—-which is another reason why I use subtitles, it’s an artificial filter to the brain—-so you simply dump truck it into your mind.

When you don’t watch it, purposefully ignore it and then look at it, it’s like a scream, a structured scream. Maybe because I also have a TV show for 14 years now where I go into a studio and me and others construct this TV show and it broadcasts—-I see the sausage being made from Gertie the pig slaughtered on the farm to Gus the ripe smelling butcher stuffing casing in the back——having never washed his hands——to the rat that fell into the grinder that the Quality Control Team associate was shocked but said nothing about——so TV to me looks like a cacophony, a slow motion mind rape. It’s loud, screaming false, distorted values and does so faster than your biological brain can filter it.

Three, the ability to question it as you watch it or stop it and consider. You watch and essentially even if you disagree with the context, you’re agreeing to the insertion of the content into your mind. It’s like disagreeing to baseball as a game but playing baseball with friends. A book you can put down, highlight, research. A film online you can even pause it, check it out, think about it—-sometimes I look a thing up on Wikipedia—-especially long series to just nutshell it for me and allow my imagination to complete watching Season 7 thru 15. (Who will ever watch 20 seasons of Supernatural? lol)

Four, you’re paying for the dreams of others. I often point out to students that when you watch TV you’re looking at an actress, say Jennifer Aniston for insanity’s point. She’s living out her dream. She likes her work and she’s paid amazingly well for it. She’s now at a point where she has more control and freedom. She’s living the Jennifer Aniston career dream which includes fame and money. And you’re sitting on your couch in a studio, eating Cheetos, watching yet another dullard episode of Friends before you doze off to go to a job you hate. You’re watching someone else live out their dreams——and paying streaming or cable or even electricity rates for the privilege of doing it (being a battery in the Matrix.)

I then point out the huge thing you must always remember—-Jennifer Aniston never sits down to watch your life, no aspect of it. She would call security, drive away, slit her wrists if forced to watch your life. She is so uninterested in everything you do that we couldn’t even get her to try watching your life for more than a few minutes before, based upon even just her pay scale/hourly value alone, she found you tepid and boring, got up from the sofa and walked away. Your life has no value to the thousands of people that are on your appointment schedule of TV/videos. Maybe not Jennifer but I’m sure thousands of others, including TV executive consider you less than a blip, barely human beyond your watching of their product….because like a drug dealer, they know you’ll be back.

I’ve never done drugs.

TV, videos, films are in medium to large doses, pacifiers—-which is why there’s no revolution—-cant get folk off the sofa and the TV programs folk what to think, how to think, not to think too far. And you’re upset at so many reboots? That’s called smashing the product—-smashing a pound of heroin with a pound of aspirin and baking soda to create 3lbs that you sell at heroin prices. A little less potent but throw in a teaspoon of fentanyl and what junkie really knows the difference. Which is why you’re on your umpteenth Superman, hospital drama, cop drama (you wonder how you live in a totalitarian state and watch decades of iterations of Law & Order?), constant mayhem and vicious violence—-how many people have you and your kids seen “simulated” killed on TV? Women? Parents? And you wonder why kids going on killing sprees after decades of this?

It was designed to control people, make a profit and repeat.

I should know, I have a TV show for 14 years. The smart move is to never do the product, but keep smashing and selling. Every dealer knows that.

  • Life is quieter, my emotions less frazzled. I don’t know when I’ve been stressed longer than a few minutes.
  • I sleep better.
  • I think better—-I focus faster, easier.
  • I think deeper.
  • Sex is better.
  • Food tastes better.
  • Reality is richer because I’m not trying to supplant it.
  • I communicate better.
  • I’ve written a hundred books.
  • I like people more. I communicate in person and notice mental illness and anxieties faster in people.
  • I feel better as a human being and I’m more productive.
  • I’m thankfully, not you.

#KylePhoenix

#TheKylePhoenixShow

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

How & Why To Write A Blog

 While I come by writing naturally, I didn't come by blogging naturally, it's been an evolution.  Recently I received an email a viewer of the Kyle Phoenix television show asking me why I hadn't written more on this blog (it's existed since 2008), that I could be using it to fill in some of the informational blanks that the show couldn't answer in a half an hour.  Then a friend and I were talking about a manuscript I have in editorial turnaround (that's when you've finished writing the story sent it to the editor/publisher (I'm one of the publisher's---Business Rule: Own Your Products) and they send it back with marketing edits and I do alterations and then I send it back and then they send it back with the editors new edits and then I send it back until we agree it's ready for publication---hence the term turnaround) and he suggested I post some of my old published articles and short stories as a way to invigorate this blog.  So I took the viewers and friends advice and really committed to writing more often but it is alot more work than simply writing.  A lot more.

What I've learned so far is to organize what I have to say---right now I have another 300 of these articles in Draft Form (on a range of subjects suggested by you the reader).  My process is I generally first add textual pieces and fun or sexy pictures to them.  I found that if I edit too much upfront it doesn't come off in the natural casual tone I'm generally aiming for in this.  I want it to be as close to how I speak if you were sitting right with me.  Also the Blogger composing screen only does so much spell checking and grammar alerting so I often have to return which a clean eye awhile later to do edits.  I start out simply saving essay ideas and headlines, then I drop in additive pieces (text, art, pics) then I try to clean up, and strengthen the essay.  The number I aim to post is about 10 a week, purposefully crafting them to coincide with the television show and YouTube videos.  I publish it, distribute it to a few close friends to get some feedback and then generally do some touch ups in the first week of a posting.

Distribution
I've recently learned how to include links to the www.kylephoenixsite.com, the television show simulcast on Thursdays at 12 midnight, the podcasts and then send it out by Twitter.  I've been experimenting with a deeper symmetry between all of these media types and trying to make sure that the information is useful and accessible in only 1 or 2 mouse clicks from every entrance point.  A lot of you readers have signed up for the e-newsletter through the website (Thank you!) so I'm working on how to send out information all while producing new segments.  It's a lot!  This month there were close to 10,000 people from all over the world signing up.  I've learned a deep sense of responsibility to not only produce useful information but also remain true to my own voice and thoughts.

I would say that's the two biggest things to blogging: maintaining your voice and sending it out to the world.  I use email, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+, Twitter, RSS (Really Simple Syndication) and YouTube for initial distribution of each blog.  My goal is to upload one piece of media and have it disassemble to multiple formats as well as to as many people/venues as possible.  As of now I'm up to close to 4 million people (!) throughout the planet from the tv show,blogs, YouTube (and other video sites), Facebook, and Twitter.  So I'm really working on how to codify that into one distribution method and I think I'll have that by January 2013 pretty much set up.

Content Is King

Content and amount of blogs to release a week are also the next big factors.  The television show and online videos give me a content warehouse of ideas plus the email responses and comments I get to both of those venues helps immeasurably on what to write.  I also have about 20 to 100 books and magazine articles on a lot of the topics---I try and distill it or include an Amazon link to the item in the blog itself so that the reader can check it out indepthly for themselves.  All of the layering controls how many blogs I produce in a timeframe, if you're doing this you really have to be conscious of your time and how long creation of content takes.

While I want the exposure to the work and the interconnection/interplay that happens I also don't want to saturate cyberspace with too much new content without giving it a chance to be digested.   But that means that sometimes though there are prime releases of articles and then a handful of reviews that are published but I don't immediately push it through all of the above channels at once.  I also limit the amount of text in reviews to only 1 or 2 paragraphs or about one to two minutes if read aloud/posted in a video.  Time, time, time.

You, The Reader Are My Editors
Thinking about the reaction from a blog has proven to be another factor.

The most important factor in all of the above planning, is you, the reader.  I'm always looking at online posts, bouncing ideas off of friends and colleagues, asking groups I facilitate for their input or thoughts so that I can craft the best item, essay, or show.  Having 20 years of writing experience and being published all over the country prior to this has given me some experience with submitting something to not only readers but more importantly an editor.  A good editor generally pushes a writer to consider clarity in their ideas so that you, the reader can not only understand me but on some level relate.

And finally I spend time considering how much of myself to put into the blogs, how much is genuinely interesting or useful, how to present my self, my interior self and experiences in a way that you can not simply relate to but also see as a human being.  I don't want to just be someone dispensing thoughts and advice and knowledge without there being a real person with strengths and flaws behind it. I originally created the television show and it's current subsidiaries to focus on men of color, particularly MSM.  Now that's expanded because of those initial viewers and readers wanting more information about education, finances, investments, entrepreneurial ventures, relationships, parenthood, race issues, motivation, politics, religion.  And that's where Kyle Phoenix and all the things I do is headed, focusing on your life success.

Thus far, at almost the end of 2012, four years since I started this---that's my process, what I've learned and why to do it.  I hope that you take advantage of the internet to share your thoughts and work and ideas and experiences in cyberspace, it's an amazing experience that has brought me friends, adventures and yes, even jobs from all around the world.

Enjoy!

Thank you,
Kyle Phoenix
kylephoenixshow@aol.com
http://kylephoenixsite.com/
Thanks and enjoy! You can Like Us on Face Book or Follow Us on Twitter!  Don't forget to watch The Kyle Phoenix Show on Channel 56 (Time Warner), 83 (RCN), 34 (Verizon) and the Thursday/Friday 12am/midnight simulcast on http://kylephoenixsite.com/

Sunday, February 19, 2012

OWN: The Oprah Winfrey Network and Its Strategic Future, Part 1


I've spent some time not only watching Oprah but more importantly studying her and to some degree integrating her into my teaching as one of the business examples. It even has lead me to start an online show and a cable TV show---looking at the model of Harpo and design of the multiple shows that have come out of that company. The problem with OWN is our perception of Oprah's success from Harpo. It took 4 to 6 years starting from the early 80's to syndication time to actually completely own the Oprah Winfrey Show. It then took another, 3 to 5 years for TV movies, almost 15 years for a feature film and then a magazine deal with Hearst, 8 years before Dr. Phil, 20 years for Rachael Ray, Dr. Oz and Nate Berkus to be spawned. 25 years for OWN. Along with a timeline, this suggests that time is Harpo's greatest strength and where it's advantage is best seen. So now we're looking at Year 2 of OWN. However the platform of cable in a universe based analogy and Discovery as a galaxy, its a greater opportunity than a disadvantage. There's literally more space and time to expand and explore. OWN will not be Oprah. She'll be the vanguard, the spear, the vision but ultimately in a twenty-year perspective, she cannot be the absolute content. One of the best models is the Fox Network and that it took 5 years to find it's legs and 10 years to become a real player and 20 to become true competition.

Oprah on The Rachael Ray Show,
partially owned and distributed by Harpo
The advantage Discovery creates is that it's worldwide, that it's 7 channels---that gives a range of over 1 billion around the world. Now at the peak, Oprah was rocking 12 to 15 million viewers---to multiply that success over multiple shows/formats is going to take time. She's arguably one of the most famous women in America but not the world. She's playing in a new market. She had on her show a young Chinese, Chen Lu Yu, a woman who has a viewership of 200 million a week in China, while Oprah was doing 40 million a week including America and international markets.

Chen Lu Yu of China
(on a set that looks a lot like the Oprah WInfrey Show)
She and Rosie (who was subsequently canceled, Iyanla Vanzant is the new hit show so far) are tent poles to a huge tent. If they're playing conservatively to cross-channel programming through the Discovery 7 then they're aiming for 150 to 200 million total viewership a week from the singular OWN channel.


Harpo has just inked a deal with HBO, Dr. Phil is repeated on OWN, the Oprah Show (no longer under it's one year contractual restrictions with Cap Cities) is now rebroadcast, finally Suze Orman is doing a show, Chaz Bono/Cher, Tyler Perry, Lisa Ling and all of the celebrity guests on Master Class plus rotating feature films.

Like Fox it will take a Simpsons, a Married with Children, American Idol---along with the Fox model; it will take a Sex In The City, The Wire, deep documentaries ala HBO but those shows that helped to tentpole a network require time.


Oprah with Dr. O Nate Berkus,
Dr Phil and Sue Orman, all of their shows
partially owned and distributed by Harpo

We can't review OWN in these first few years for long-term success. We have to see it in increments of 1,3,5,10, 15 and 20 years. Oprah has always played the long game----holding her show on the air until Harpo was self-supporting beyond just her daytime show, expanding into multiple forms of media to literally create its own engine of production in TV, print, cable, publishing (those O magazines compiled books), radio, public showcases, and relationships.



OWN Year 3---they'll have a handful of mini, mid and 1 or 2 large tent poles for the network.

OWN Year 5---there will be at least 3 to 5 large tent poles as the minis and mids provide enough survival time to grow the big ones.

OWN Year 10---a fuller network that is a hybrid of HBO/OWN--its no coincidence that they're in partnership to learn how to do what HBO has done in 20 years. Not the route of the former MTV President.

Because we have to consider what is AFTER reality television? That's Oprah's long-term ability, the capacity to consider the field, the long-term strategy and play hold 'em and build 'em, while maintaining full control and ownership. Not many businesses/owners have the gravitas to play such a long-range game but what the real investment in Oprah by Discovery is, is that she is platinum branded to keep sponsors with her long-term no matter the choppy seas and the ability to mass millions of people to follow.


Now she's traveling to India and other places in the world, becoming International Oprah---I think she's going to do something unique to Americans---bring them the world through their trusted cipher.

Thank you,


(This blog was originally in answer to a commentary system on Forbes.com (http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2011/10/06/oprah-winfrey-and-discovery-hit-the-reset-button-on-own/Oprah) concerning The OWN Network and some responses ideas etc. there.)