This question previously had details. They are now in a comment.
Poor students also wouldn't have access to progressive material.
The expectations of all students is blind faith. Consider
The expectations of all students is blind faith. Consider
that you teach a child but rarely get to see their outcome and usage of that learning. Most teachers never do . What we do see is a students confined advance within a schooling system. Even if they graduate you're handing them off to college. So you're only going to get the payoff of a good student in school not the outcome. That means accolades for your work aren't coming because gifted work is hard to see. Out of sight, out of measurement.
No measures, no funding streams.
Gifted programs exist due to visible measurements in a system and out of it.
Does your high school student/teacher know your, the students college professor? No continuity of measurement.
Gifted programs exist due to visible measurements in a system and out of it.
Does your high school student/teacher know your, the students college professor? No continuity of measurement.
Gifted is development of affinity, all districts don’t have the range of products to expose the whole student to first a wide range of domains, literature, science, dance, engineering, human science, animal science, creativity , design and innovation training.
So the gifted poor potential musicians only hear rap, while those with greater educated parents and resourced districts are train to expose, identify and begin enhancement towards their potentially gifted, if they believe it will be substantially worth it. Again environment limitations.
Or Click Below to:
No comments:
Post a Comment